The Nature of Judgment 3/28/11
Monday, March 28, 2011 at 11:46AM The Nature of Judgment
I have an intimate relationship with an apricot tree. I’ve known this tree since 1995, when it was the deciding factor in my buying the house where it lives. The previous owner had “pruned” it by whacking off the two main trunks three feet from the ground and a couple of years brought a riot of branches out of the stumps. Since then I have pruned, fertilized, mulched and loved this tree, watching it grow to a sturdy beauty in front of my house. In the few years that it bears fruit in July, I’m convinced they are the best apricots in town, small, golden bursts of apricot essence. And yearly, in March as the sun climbs higher in the sky, I watch as apricot trees all over town explode in pink/white blossoms, the first to grace spring with their flowers. For a week or so, they are vulnerable to cold, after that the tiny green almonds of fruit can take a light frost. But more often than not, a late freeze nips the blossoms and litters the ground with brown wilted petals, ending my hopes for fruit that year. So I watch and pray and check weather reports as if I had a million dollars at risk on Wall Street.
When I step back in reflection—rarely—I find that all my hopes for the abundance of Spring and all my fears of the deprivations of unstable climate are wrapped up in my prayers for my apricot tree. So when it keeps blossoms and sets fruit, I think the world may just make it through another year. And when flowers freeze, wilt and drop, I feel my shoulders sag with the weight of impending doom.
Interestingly though, I don’t think the tree shares either my elation or despair. In years that it bears fruit, it feeds me, my neighbors, the birds, the dog and the worms, and propagates more trees. In years that little or no apricots mature, the tree grows full and green, funneling its life force into longer and stronger branches. Eventually it will slow down, dry up and die, leaving room for some other plant to turn water and sunlight into chlorophyll, fruit and seed.
I think my dog shares this same non-attachment to the outcomes of life. The exuberant profusion of blossoms may be likened to the dog's joyful racing around the yard when we prepare to go out for a walk. And the dog may experience sadness when left at home alone, as the tree may be stressed in a dry year when the snow fails to pile up. But neither of them is capable of making judgments about their condition. They would not blame me for neglect. Most of Earth’s creatures live in acceptance of their situations. Prayer for anything else is not an option. What would they pray to or for? They appear to be unconsciously part of it all.
A wise story comes to mind; If you want to know who loves you, lock your husband and your dog in the trunk of the car for an hour. Which one is happy to see you when you open the trunk? We humans seem to be unique in our ability to make judgments about the circumstances of our lives. The husband most likely has feelings about being locked in the trunk. He may need an explanation, a drink of water, and have a clear request about the use of the trunk of the car in the future. But all of his “should’s” and “ought to’s,” shame and blame, emerge from his judgment and will mask his ability to listen, understand and accept the fact that you had to hide him while Godzilla waltzed down the street.
I expect that the earth experiences pain in some form when covered with concrete, drilled, bulldozed, trees cut and rivers plugged. And I trust that it will come into balance eventually. But it makes no judgment. The new age opinion that “Gaia” will get fed up and strike back is just another human projection, a judgment based on how we would respond when we perceive that we’ve been locked in the trunk. Only a human could take a hurricane or an earthquake personally. We are champions of such analysis, opinion and assumption. It has led us out of the Garden of Eden and into a world in which our comfort precedes and separates us from our membership in the community of our planet.
I expect my apricot tree responds positively to the mulch I spread under it and the care I take in pruning. That kind of prayer seems to be effective, though the results are still up for grabs. It has not yet responded to my prayers to bloom in April rather than March. Neither has the weather changed its fickle progression from winter to spring. It is my dog’s nature to bark at the neighbors, despite my near insanity about it. And my teenage son’s flagrant misuse of the ketchup bottle in the refrigerator is quite out of my control. So I have to ask myself, “To whom am I praying to change these things?” Or, more to the point, “What judgment underlies my prayer?” The notion that my world is not to my liking, and that somehow I have the power, even the responsibility to change it, strikes me now as the ultimate hubris. That kind of prayer goes not to a higher power, it assumes that I am the higher power, and far more than a late Spring frost, or spilled ketchup, will lead to my ultimate despair. Would I be more at peace if I were to keep doing the things that grow strong trees, happy dogs and compassionate relationships; and learn to accept that the results are not entirely up to me? The simple answer is yes of course—but as Eve discovered with Adam, simple does not imply easy.
A quick caveat. In challenging us to consider acceptance over manipulation of our environment, I’m not suggesting that we accept personal, social or political injustice. I fully endorse the passionate fight for life. I’m suggesting that too often we pursue our own comfort as if it were a fight for life, with no thought to the consequences and to our own and our planet’s detriment.
In considering what separates me from my dog and my tree, I’ve commonly laid blame on this whole concept of judgment. No small irony in judging my judgment. So, how to approach this unique human quality of judgment from a different angle? I’ve long operated on the notion that God doesn’t make junk, no mistakes. Its all here as part of the grand experiment of life, therefore this fascinating experience of attaching value to the events of our lives must lead to opportunity for growth somewhere. One of our wise men, Marshall Rosenberg, founder of Nonviolent Communication, separates value judgment from moralistic judgment. Deciding to pursue those things that enhance my life involves values. I prefer fish to beef. It is clear that my dog values running in the woods with me. Can I even say that my apricot tree values water? (hmm maybe not) But knowing what brings us joy and pursuing it, and what brings pain and avoiding it are reasonable value judgments to make. On the other hand, making up that you are wrong and I am right involves morals and tends to separate me from you, and almost always obscures my opportunity for growth. Despite my upset, my son is not a bad person because he fails to put the top on the ketchup bottle. My moralistic judgment about it separates me from him and divorces me from owning my underlying value of tidiness and perhaps care of our resources. How many of us have been through a painful relationship breakup, or the death of a loved one? “It shouldn’t have happened. Damn you it’s your fault. I’ve been cheated. My life is ruined. If I’m good maybe she’ll come back.” Elizabeth Kubler-Ross outlines a common and healthy progression of responses to loss including all of the above statements. They suggest a normal and healthy emotional response to events that seem to go against us. It only becomes a problem when I stay attached to my judgment and find myself still angry at the SOB ten years later.
I propose that in moments of sanity, we consider a different set of questions. Rather than deciding that I don’t deserve pain in my back, or that I’ve been wronged by my ex-wife, or any other “why me” questions; and rather than praying for a week of warm weather around apricot blossom time; or even praying that my friend gets the kidney transplant that could prolong his life—How about asking what lesson, what experience, is my higher power seeking in this situation? My prayer for my friend then becomes, “I hope he can use this ‘tragedy’ to deepen his relationship with his higher power.” The killing frost in late March now offers me the opportunity to let go of results, invite wonder into my life, and accept that I am not in charge.
I am not in charge of my death. I’m not in charge of the price of gas. I’m not in charge of my partner, or my kids, or my dog, or the weather. I have preferences and I am in charge of how compassionately I share them. I am in charge of the environmental impact of my life, of riding my bicycle instead of driving my car, of eating my apricots, of approaching my children with compassion. I am in charge of the food I eat, my exercise level and my resulting health. I’m not in charge of earthquakes or hurricanes, global warming or the AIDS virus, and neither are you. Those things are not messages to, or judgments passed on, us by God or the Earth. They are part of life and death. It happens. Our blessed opportunity, totally different from the beasts and the plants of our planet, who seem to live in unconscious acceptance, is to seek beneath our judgments of events to find acceptance.
Humanity’s evolution of judgment—what appears to be our unique ability to decide we don’t like the way things are going and do something about it—now shifts from separating our selves from the rest of nature, each other and ourselves through moralistic rights and wrongs, to consciously rejoining the soulful natural world in choosing acceptance. This shift includes practicing the discipline of reflection to explore the consequences of my actions, and asking the difficult questions to discover my underlying needs rather than act to satisfy my immediate comforts. It is in those choices that we are unique on this planet. It is in those reflections that we can rejoin the Garden with awareness, rediscover wonder, and pull in the reigns on our assumption of fixing it all to our liking. This is my spiritual discipline.
—Jeff Hood, March 28, 2011
Jeff Hood |
2 Comments | 
